Jonny Roberts

Labour is going to deliver a 'Tax Dodging Bill' to close loopholes and stamp out tax evasion

Over the past few days I've been contacted by angry constituents. They're demanding action on the big corporations and their highest ranking shareholders and Chief Executives who dodge their taxes while our public services are being cut back and average workers' pay has stagnated for years. 

They are rightly angry because the vast majority of people, even the majority of celebrities and big businessmen, pay their fair share of taxes only to see this select few, the very richest people in our society, opt out of their obligations. 

These constituents who have emailed me are asking me to support a campaign, backed by Oxfam, the NUS, War on Want and many other great organisations, that is calling for a 'Tax Dodging Bill' that will close loopholes that let big corporations get away with paying low or no tax on their profits. 

I'm proud and pleased to say that Labour have today announced that our first Budget will introduce exactly the measures that the Tax Dodging Bill campaign has been calling for. 

Labour will:

·         Introduce penalties for those who are caught by the General Anti-Abuse Rule

·         Close loopholes used by hedge funds to avoid stamp duty

·         Close loopholes like the Eurobonds loophole which allow some large companies to move profits out of the UK and avoid Corporation Tax

·         Stop umbrella companies exploiting tax reliefs

·         Scrapping the “Shares for Rights” scheme, which the OBR has warned could enable avoidance and cost £1bn and is administered by HMRC, and so ensure HMRC can better focus on tackling tax avoidance

·         Tackle disguised self-employment by introducing strict deeming criteria

·         Tackle the use of dormant companies to avoid tax by requiring them to report more frequently

Labour’s measures to tackle tax avoidance will also include:

·         Ensuring stronger independent scrutiny of the tax system, including reliefs, and the government’s efforts to tackle tax avoidance

·         Forcing the UK’s Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies to produce publicly available registries of beneficial ownership

·         Making country-by-country reporting information publicly available

·         Ensuring developing countries are properly engaged in the drawing up of global tax rules

I urge you to sign up to the Tax Dodging Bill campaign and contact Richard Benyon to ask him why he's not backing these tough measures to crack down on those who believe that the virtue of their vast wealth means tax rules shouldn't apply to them.

The number of people receiving housing benefit in the West Berks area has risen 46% since 2010

The number of West Berks residents receiving housing benefit has soared by 46% since the Tory / Lib Dem Coalition Government came to power.

Stats released by the Government's Department for Work and Pensions and analysed by Labour's Southern Taskforce show that between May 2010 and August 2014 (the latest available statistics) more than 500 additional households have begun claiming support to help them with housing costs. 

These figures show two chronic failures of this Coalition Government. 

First, their failure to make work pay as the majority of these additional claimants are in-work but have seen their pay fall in real terms behind inflation, on average by around £1,600.

Second, their failure to address rents rising above inflation. Rents across England have risen by 4.2% in the same time period and West Berks rents now sit nearly £200 above that average

A Labour Government would introduce three-year secure tenancies where the landlord couldn't raise the original quoted rent above inflation within those three years and we'd cut housing benefit for the long term by building more social housing.

Our policies designed to make work pay such as raising the Minimum Wage above £8 an hour and stamping down on zero-hours contracts will also reduce spending on housing benefit without hurting those who currently receive it. 

 

Labour will double paternity leave to 4 weeks and increase the amount paid too

Fantastic news for new fathers-to-be. 

Today Ed Miliband announced that Labour would double the time new Dads can take off for paid paternity leave from the current 2 weeks to 4 weeks under a Labour Government.

Better still, they'd get £260 a week for each of those 4 weeks instead of the £140 a week they get now. 

How would we fund it? Well that's the genius. Labour has already announced that we'll extend the amount of free childcare for parents of 3 and 4 year olds from 15 hours currently up to a new 25 hours a week entitlement. That policy actually saves the Government money normally spent paying those families tax credits to help them pay for childcare so this new policy of extended paternity leave is actually paid out of the money Government would save from extending free childcare! 

The free childcare itself pays for itself as more parents are able to either go back to work or work longer hours than they currently do thus bringing in bigger income tax and National Insurance revenues and reducing the amount of tax credits paid out even further! That's the progressive way to cut the deficit and boost family incomes at the same time. 

 

Ed Miliband announces the right for employees to buy their company during business succession

 

I'm a member of both the Labour Party and the Co-Operative Party.  

The latter is (since the 1930s) a sister-party of the former and exists nowadays to promote the idea of co-operatives and mutualism within the Labour Party. 

Mutualism is the idea that lies behind John Lewis, building societies, credit unions and the Co-operative branded shops, funeral parlours and banks. it's the idea that employees, and in some cases customers, should own a share in the business they work for.  

Co-operative Party ideals are behind some of Labour's recent policy announcements on giving fans a bigger say in how their football clubs are run, for giving passengers a formal role in overseeing the rail industry and for expanding credit unions.  

Today Ed Miliband has added to that list by announcing that a Labour government will legislate to allow employees to bid to takeover their employer if the business owners want to sell up (an attractive option for owners who want to see their legacy continue in the hands of those who have an obvious interest in the long-term success of the business) or its in danger of shutting down. 

He also announced that co-operative businesses seeking to expand will be able to access credit through Labour's previously announced new state-run British Business Bank.  

These ideas will help increase the number of employees who own a share of the business they work for and give them a greater say in how it is run. Empowering workers in a way that is not only pro-growth but pro-long term growth not quick-fix, short-termist growth that is too often a characteristic of our economy currently.

 

 

Make sure you register to vote

Thousands of Newbury constituents may miss out on their chance to vote if they don't register by April 20th. 

The Government's new individual voter registration means that no-one can register you except you - not your parents, not your landlord nor your spouse - it's all on you!

You can register to vote online in less than 5 minutes by clicking on the photo below. 

Today was also the release of an important report from the House of Commons cross-party Constitutional Reform Committee. 

The Committee calls for immediate action to encourage more people to vote. I completely back their call for the introduction of online voting, trying out weekend voting to see if that improves turnout and also allowing people to register on the day of the election at the polling booth. 

I'm pleased that Labour have agreed to move towards online voting. 

We've also said that we would:

  • Improve Citizenship education in schools so its not just an add-on as it can be in some schools
  • Make it mandatory for schools to inform local electoral officers about young people approaching voting age (as has worked very well already in Northern Ireland)
  • Lower the voting age to 16 

I'm backing the Cold Homes Week campaign

image.jpg

I'm really pleased to back Energy Bill Revolution's 'Cold Homes Week' campaign.  

The campaign calls for a street-by-street home insulation programme. Britain has some of the most inefficient housing stock in the developed world when it comes to keeping heat in. It escapes through roofs, walls and windows. This wasted heat means many spend much more than they should do heating their home. 

I'm proud of Labour's policies on energy bills. Locally we've campaigned for West Berks Council to run a collective switching scheme to help residents come together to barter for better deals from energy suppliers and nationally we've promised to freeze energy bills at their May 2015 price for 20 months meaning bills can fall but cannot rise in that time. We'd use that time to permanently reshape the energy market so that it was more competitive and therefore had greater downward pressure on prices for the long-term. 

In relation to insulation I'm particularly proud that we will deliver a programme of home insulation for 3million of the most poorly insulated homes over the next ten years. This is a huge programme that will create jobs as well as saving consumers from fuel poverty.  

Fuel poverty is defined as a household spending more than 10% of their income on heating their home. Millions across Britain are in this situation and I was saddened that even here in Newbury constituency over 3,000 people are defined as being in fuel poverty.

That fact makes it even more shocking that while over 250 MPs have supported the Cold Homes Week campaign, Newbury's Richard Benyon isn't one of them.

I'm committed to reducing energy bills for the people of Newbury and I back this campaign wholeheartedly. 

New Hungerford homes won't be ring-fenced for local residents, but they could be under Labour

Hungerford Conservatives seem to agree with Labour Party policy on new homes. 

Newbury Weekly News reports that the part-buy, part-rent (shared ownership) homes being built as part of a new affordable housing project in Hungerford won't be prioritised for local residents. 

Conservative Town Mayor Dennis Bennyworth is reported as backing calls for the homes to be reserved for Hungerford residents but fellow Tory Councillor Paul Hewer, who sits on West Berks Council's planning committee, disagreed and backed the District Council's decision, saying such a move would be 'discrimination'.  

If Mayor Bennyworth or any other Hungerford residents feel that new homes should be ring fenced for first-time buyers in the local community to bid first then they should vote Labour as this is exactly what we would do.

Our housing policy, announced late last year, would allow councils, developers and housing associations to stipulate a period of time where local residents are given priority to buy any newly built homes in order to help first-time buyers stay in their home towns. 

Labour is trying to save West Berks from fracking but the job isn't finished yet

Last week Labour forced the Government into a u-turn on its proposed fracking free-for-all.

After great pressure from Labour and campaign groups the Government finally accepted our amendments in the House of Commons which mean fracking will be banned in all National Parks, Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty, Sites of Special Scientific Interest and groundwater Source Protection Zones.

These measures should, in theory, act as a blanket ban on fracking happening here in West Berks but the Guardian reports that a spokesperson from the Department of Energy & Climate Change said it was "too early to say what areas might be affected by the extension of protections" as the measures may be overturned in the House of Lords. In particular, they were unable to say whether all levels of groundwater Source Protection Zones (SPZs) would be covered. 

If it turns out that the Tory-Lib Dem intention is to only ban fracking in what the Environment Agency describes as Level 1 or 2 SPZs then large swathes of the area would continue to be potential sites for shale gas and oil extraction. If the much-wider SPZ Level 3 (see map) is protected as Labour intend then all of Newbury and Thatcham are to protected from fracking. 

The rest of West Berks outside Newbury and Thatcham will be protected by our amendment because it prevents fracking in Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty and the North Wessex Downs extends across the West of the area. 

I'm pleased that a Labour government is committed to a frack-free West Berkshire and I hope that Tory and Lib Dem members of the House of Lords will not remove these proposed protections. I also hope that the Coalition Government will include all levels of SPZ in the final legislation so all of West Berks is covered. 

Fracking can be dangerous to water supplies and cause tremors; it would blight the countryside with huge drills and large trucks driving to and from the sites but worst of all it would distract from our mission to move towards renewable forms of clean energy.  

West Berks residents don't want fracking and if im elected in May I'll ensure they get their wish. 

Parkway social housing scandal has gone on far too long

The Newbury Weekly News reports again today that the scandal of homes designated for social housing tenants lying empty at the Parkway development continues to go on without resolution in sight. 

This whole situation is a debacle from start to finish. 

First, West Berkshire Council (and thus council tax payers) were robbed of £900,000 when the developer, Standard Life Investments, persuaded the Tory-run Council that they couldn't possibly afford to go ahead with the whole development if they had to meet their obligations to build these social homes without subsidy. 

Second, its quite clear to me that developer has taken the decision to delay the assigning of a housing association partner to rent out these flats because they feared that having them occupied would affect their ability to sell the private flats. They have essentially assumed their potential customers are snobs and in doing so prevented 37 families from leaving the social housing waiting list and taking up residence in the flats that are designated for their use.

What makes the whole thing inexplicable is that a year ago West Berks Council, quite rightly, blocked them from selling private flats until a housing association partner was sourced. Why this hasn't prompted them into action I don't know. 

Social housing tenants are not a second-class of citizen, they are simply families on low-to-middle incomes who can't afford market rates of rent. These can be newly-qualified teachers, trainee nurses and apprentices in all sorts of trades. It's desperately important that we build more social housing to clear the waiting list but its even more outrageous that there are 37 homes already built and waiting to be occupied. 

I sincerely back West Berks Council in taking any action against the developers but frankly these are obscene delays and I would urge that they immediately try to involve the Secretary of State for Local Government & Communities in the matter. 

Preserving competition in our mobile network market - A letter to Richard Benyon MP

You may or may not have read the recent news that the mobile company Three is seeking to buy O2.  

I'm really concerned that consolidation in the mobile market (which already started with the merger of Orange and T-Mobile into EE) could see prices rise and customer service worsen. 

There is further cause for concern in that Vodafone is such a huge and important employer in this area and if this deal went through they would be left as the smallest of the big three operators in the UK thus potentially putting local jobs at risk. 

If elected in May I would be using my power and influence as an MP to urge UK and EU-level competition regulators to investigate this deal and I'd make representations at any subsequent inquiries to state the case against further consolidation of our vibrant mobile market which has delivered some of the lowest prices in Europe. 

However, business moves fast and this deal could be on the table before May. So today I'm writing to Richard Benyon to ask him to take this action immediately should any deal be brought forward: 

 

Dear Mr Benyon

There has been considerable speculation over the past 2-3 weeks regarding a buy-out of mobile phone company O2 by its rival Three. 

This comes hot on the heels of news that BT plans to buy EE (itself a merger between Orange and T-Mobile). 

I'm concerned that further consolidation of our mobile phone market and the reduction in choice for consumers will lead to higher prices in the medium-to-long term and may also lessen the focus on delivering quality customer service. 

Believe it or not but British consumers are currently able to access some of the lowest mobile contract prices in Europe thanks to our more competitive market.

Further cause for concern is that Vodafone, obviously such a huge and vital local employer, would be negatively affected becoming the smallest of the remaining big networks. 

So I am writing to you today to ask you to pledge that you will do all you can to ensure that the EU and UK competition regulators investigate any potential merger between O2 and Three and make representations to those investigations regarding the negative effects of reducing consumer choice. 

Yours Sincerely, 

Jonny Roberts

Parliamentary Candidate for Newbury

Newbury Constituency Labour Party 

 

 

The Tories have turned out the lights but Labour has got a plan to turn them back on and still save money

I've always been a fan of Hilary Benn, he's a great speech maker (must run in the family!) and one of the most astute minds in the Shadow Cabinet. He's demonstrated that again today by talking into an important issue, one that really resonates with voters up and down the country and, best of all, offering a solution to the problem. 

The issue is that the Tories have literally taken us back to the dark ages. By that I mean the news that 75% of councils in England have dimmed or turned off their street lights to save money. Under this Government streetlights have become merely eyesore memorials to a day when we could afford to help people get home safe after dark. As Ed Miliband is fond of saying: 'Britain can do better than this'.

So Hilary Benn's solution is two fold. Firstly Labour will allow Councils a 4-year budget cycle rather 12 months. That will free them to make sound investments now to save big money later. So secondly Labour councils (and hopefully Tory and Lib Dem ones too) would invest in new low energy LED bulbs for street lights as they are doing in Madrid (see more here: http://www.theclimategroup.org/what-we-do/news-and-blogs/madrid-to-upgrade-100-of-its-street-lights-with-smart-and-sustainable-led-system/). These energy savings of 44% are not only better for the environment but they'll mean savings for cash-strapped councils thus allowing them to keep the lights on.

Remember it's not just about helping people FEEL safe, street lighting genuinely does cut crime and save lives so even being totally mercenary about it - turning off street lights costs more in the long run whereas Labour has put forward an alternative that saves on the cost of running the lights and avoids the human and fiscal costs caused when the Tories turn out the lights. 

Thank you for the support

Today I was selected by Newbury Labour Party members to be their candidate for the General Election in May. 

I want to thank all the members who voted for me and promise that'll I give everything I've got to make this an exciting and successful campaign in both the General and local elections. 

The next 4 1/2 months will be immensely challenging for us but I really believe that the more we can get out there and speak to people across the constituency they'll connect with our positive vision for Newbury and our plan for a better Britain. 

On Wednesday night at our all-members meeting I'll be setting out initial thoughts on how we can campaign and inviting any thoughts or suggestions. 

Thanks again 

Universal Credit is just a plaster for the deep problems of our economy - Labour has a long-term vision to get welfare spending down fairly

Last week Iain Duncan Smith triumphantly announced that his much-delayed Universal Credit system would finally roll-out fully to 7million claimants by 2019.

Now that's 2 years later than planned and the system has been beset by constant problems with the IT required to operate it properly but all in all I do support the laudable aims of the UC. The idea of merging a number of benefits and tax credits into a single system whereby claimants must only enter their information once (ensuring benefits to which people are entitled to aren't missed out on), a system that is flexible enough to respond to the fluctuating weekly incomes of claimants (a increasing commonality in the low-pay end of our labour market) and one that tapers benefits away as people earn more (rather than creating cliff-edges like the old 16 hours a week rule) are all measures that have my total support. 

My issue is that simply improving the benefits system is like sticking a plaster on the problem rather than tackling the root causes of growing demand for welfare. It can't be right that 7million people need benefits (bearing in mind that disabled benefits and child benefit are outside the remit of Universal Credit) and especially considering that unemployment is reducing - the vast majority of these 7million claimants are in work! It says everything about our economy's failure to produce good jobs with fair wages for far too few.

Iain Duncan Smith's prognosis is that people have been made idle by the system and he will tell you that by tapering benefits away UC increases the 'incentives' to work more  hours, thus paying for the system as people will now work more and claim less. The system will certainly remove some of the aforementioned silly disincentives but the fundamental problem he and this Government refuse to accept is that too many jobs are paying too little for people to live on, too many landlords charge rents that are too high for people to afford and childcare costs are spiralling out of control.

Let's clear the party political air here. The last Labour government introduced a myriad of tax credits designed to redistribute income from the more wealthy to the low-paid. This, again, was laudable and combined with a new National Minimum Wage it improved the lives of millions who had suffered under the previous 18 years of Conservative rule. However we did too little to tackle low pay - real pay rates stagnated over our latter years in power - and far too little was done on house building where the sell off of millions of council homes under Thatcher had, quite rightly, created homeowners of many working class families for the first time but, criminally, the revenue was never ring-fenced to build a new generation of social homes thus resulting in huge waiting lists for social housing and an increasing reliance on the private rented sector.

So even under Universal Credit the Government will continue to subsidise subsistence wages from big employers and high rents charged by property magnates such as our own local MP, Richard Benyon who is estimated to have made £120,000+ a year from housing benefit.

Labour has made it a priority to reduce welfare spending in the long-term. Not through the cruel freezing of benefits so that their real value falls as inflation rises nor through simply cutting away at entitlements. No, instead Labour will tackle the root causes of poverty. 

In the immediate short-term we will:

- Raise the Minimum Wage to £8 by 2020 at the very latest.

- Cut business rates for small firms and freeze energy prices for 20 months to further help small businesses thus freeing up some cash for potential pay rises or taking on new workers.

- Introduce a one-off Living Wage Contract that will reward firms who agree to pay all their staff the living wage by giving them  some of the additional income tax and National Insurance revenue / benefit
savings generated by them paying higher wages. 

- Force employers who use 'zero hours contracts' to offer a permanent contract after 3 months.

- Increase fines for employers who aren't paying the minimum wage and focusing HMRC resources on finding and tackling such businesses.

- Introduce a Jobs Guarantee - funded by a tax on bankers bonuses - that will mean any young person out of work for more than a year, or anyone over 25 out of work for more than 2, will be given a paid job placement to help them back into the labour market.

- Reform tenancy agreements so that people renting in the private sector are able to secure 3 year fixed tenancies with rents not able to rise by more than inflation during those tenancies - thus helping keep Housing Benefit in check. 

- Reduce demand for the childcare element of Universal Credit by increasing the free entitlement for 3 and 4 year olds from 15 hours a week to 25 hours a week and also introducing a Primary School Guarantee where local primary schools will be open and offering activities from 8am-6pm.


And we'll take action for the longer term too, including:

- Better careers advice in schools and a far better vocational route to help those who don't want to go to university to enable them to acquire degree-level skills and move into well paid careers. 

- Get annual housebuilding rates up to 200,000 or more by 2020 and continue at that pace thereafter so as to meet housing demand, reduce social housing waiting lists and make the dream of home ownership a more likely reality for the many not just the few. 

- Introduce a new goal for the Low Pay Commission to ensure the Minimum Wage at least keeps pace with rises in average earnings.


This is a plan to reduce welfare spending but to do so in a way that improves livelihoods rather than shattering them. It's an example of our wider vision too, of how Labour would reduce the deficit in a fairer way than the Conservatives and at the same time begin to build a better, fairer economy that works for ordinary people not just a privileged few at the top.